+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Who is Flynax

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    28

    Who is Flynax

    Hi,

    One question, who is Flynax and where are you based? From what I can see, Flynax is a Russian company, is this correct? I'm just asking.

  2. #2
    Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Fukushima
    Posts
    299
    Quote Originally Posted by Rune Hansen View Post
    Hi,

    One question, who is Flynax and where are you based? From what I can see, Flynax is a Russian company, is this correct? I'm just asking.
    Any issue with that?

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    28
    Quote Originally Posted by Skorpion View Post
    Any issue with that?
    No problem with this, but when there is no information about the company and where their location is on the website, I see this as a problem.

  4. #4
    Flynax developer John's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    607
    Hi guys!
    Flynax is a US-registered Company (Miami, FL) and our main Technical Support Department is located in Central Asia.
    We also have a number of customers from the post-soviet countries. For this reason, we opened an office in Russia in order to handle customer requests.

    John

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    28
    Quote Originally Posted by John View Post
    Hi guys!
    Flynax is a US-registered Company (Miami, FL) and our main Technical Support Department is located in Central Asia.
    We also have a number of customers from the post-soviet countries. For this reason, we opened an office in Russia in order to handle customer requests.

    John
    Thanks for reply! This explains why I have received support mail in Russian language from Flynax..

  6. #6
    Flynax developer John's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    607
    Hello Rune, looks like guys sent you the message by mistake.

    John

+ Reply to Thread